Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (2) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....E ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE RESPONDENT ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MAUNA M. BHATT 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to issue direction to the respondents to forthwith grant outstanding refund amount of Rs.13,82,437/- for the year 2008-2009 along with proportionate interest. 2. The brief facts are: 2.1. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... notice for audit assessment for the year 2008-2009 and, therefore, the petitioner approached the respondent authorities vide letter dated 9.9.2011 requesting for generation of task for assessment, since refund was claimed in the return filed for the said year. Thereafter multiple oral reminders were made to the authorities for availing the refund. However, no response was received to such reminde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the respondent-State. 4. Mr. Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that it is not in dispute that after filing of the return, the time limit for re-assessment under the VAT Act had expired and no order of assessment and re-assessment has been framed by the authority. He further submitted that the issue is squarely covered by two decisions of this Court (i) Malhotra Graphics Thr....