Supreme Court Rejects Special Leave Petition, Upholds Lower Court's Decision Without Detailed ReasoningSC dismisses special leave petition filed by petitioner challenging lower court order. Court comprising Justices Bose and Dhulia rejected the petition without detailed reasoning, effectively upholding the previous judicial determination. No substantial legal grounds were found to interfere with the existing judicial decision. Title: Supreme Court of India dismisses special leave petition

- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
- Citation: 2023 (1) TMI 793 - SC Order
- Petitioner's Counsel: Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi, AOR, Ms. Jyoti Chaturvedi, Adv.
- Respondent's Counsel: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG (NP), Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv, Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv, Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv, Mr. Vishal Agarwal, Adv, Ms. Snehashish Mukherji Adv, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
- Decision: The special leave petition is dismissed; pending application(s), if Seeking Grant of Regular Bail - availment of fraudulent Input Tax Credit - it was held by High Court that Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the allegations made against the applicant, the evidence collected by the prosecution, seriousness of the offence the applicant cannot be released on bail. HELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere with the order impugned in this petition at this stage. SLP dismissed. Basudev Mittal Versus Union of India
GST
2023 (1) TMI 793 - SC Order - 2023 (69) G. S. T. L. 118 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - SC
Dated:- 12-12-2022
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl. ) No(s). 8128/2022 - -
GST
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi, AOR, Ms. Jyoti Chaturvedi, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG (NP), Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv, Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv, Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv, Mr. Vishal Agarwal, Adv, Ms. Snehashish Mukherji Adv, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR. ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. We do not find any reason to interfere with the order impugned in this petition at this stage. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders