2019 (11) TMI 1773
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ounsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal has been filed belatedly after 668 days with the following prayers: PRAYERS (1) Decide the questions of law as framed hereinabove in favour of the appellant and thereby allow the appeal in full with consequential relief to the appellant; (2) Set aside the impugned ex-parte Final Order Nos.20550-20551/2017 dated 26/04/2017 (produced at Annexure-A) and the Misc. Order Nos.20224-20225/2019 dated 04/04/2019 (produced at Annexure-B) passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal) respectively in appeal Nos. E/511/2003-DB and E/512/2003-DB and Misc. Application Nos. E/ROA/20187/2019 and E/ROA/20188/2019; (3) Se....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the documents placed on by the Appellants were not at all considered? (e) Whether the impugned ex-parte final order of the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal is correct and legally sustainable in deciding the appeals on merits without giving sufficient opportunity to the Appellants even though the appeals were coming up for hearing after fourteen years of its filing? (f) Whether the impugned ex-parte final order of the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal is correct and legally sustainable in holding that the brand names 'NUCOR WELD' and 'KEMTRODE' does not belongs to the Appellants even though the evidences produced by Appellants proves to the contrary? (g) Whether the impugned ex-parte final order of the Hon'ble Appellate ....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI