Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (11) TMI 1773

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ounsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal has been filed belatedly after 668 days with the following prayers: PRAYERS (1) Decide the questions of law as framed hereinabove in favour of the appellant and thereby allow the appeal in full with consequential relief to the appellant; (2) Set aside the impugned ex-parte Final Order Nos.20550-20551/2017 dated 26/04/2017 (produced at Annexure-A) and the Misc. Order Nos.20224-20225/2019 dated 04/04/2019 (produced at Annexure-B) passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal) respectively in appeal Nos. E/511/2003-DB and E/512/2003-DB and Misc. Application Nos. E/ROA/20187/2019 and E/ROA/20188/2019; (3) Se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the documents placed on by the Appellants were not at all considered? (e) Whether the impugned ex-parte final order of the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal is correct and legally sustainable in deciding the appeals on merits without giving sufficient opportunity to the Appellants even though the appeals were coming up for hearing after fourteen years of its filing? (f) Whether the impugned ex-parte final order of the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal is correct and legally sustainable in holding that the brand names 'NUCOR WELD' and 'KEMTRODE' does not belongs to the Appellants even though the evidences produced by Appellants proves to the contrary? (g) Whether the impugned ex-parte final order of the Hon'ble Appellate ....