2022 (3) TMI 1466
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in i/b. Ms. Rushita Jain, for the Petitioner. Mr. Sham Walve, for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ORDER P.C.: Petitioner is impugning a notice dated 30th March, 2019 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for A.Y. 2012-13 and order passed on 18th November, 2019 rejecting Petitioner's objection to reopening on various grounds. 2. The primary ground that has been ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ver Petitioner, such notice was bad on the count of having been issued by an officer who had no authority in law to issue such notice. 4. We have considered the affidavit in reply of one Mr. Suresh G. Kamble, ITO who had issued the notice under section 148 of the Act. Said Mr. Kamble, ITO, Ward 12(3)(1), Mumbai admits that such a defective notice has been issued but according to him, PAN of Pet....
TaxTMI