2008 (5) TMI 171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - This appeal has been filed against Order-in-Original No. 1/2008 dated 1-1-2008 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore. 2. Shri G.H. Pradyumna, learned Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellants and Shri Hitesh Shah, learned SDR for the Revenue. 3. We heard both sides. The appellants imported three consignments of vitrified tiles decla....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8.28 per sq. metre in terms of Customs Notification No. 73/2003 dated 1-5-2003. In view of the mis-declaration, proceedings were initiated against the appellants. The Adjudicating Authority in the impugned order classified the goods under CTH 6907.10.10. Further, he demanded anti-dumping duty of Rs. 9,16,402/-. The goods were confiscated under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act. However, an option ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-dumping duty, the appellants had mis-declared. He also 'invited our attention to the Certificate for China Compulsory Product Certification, wherein following certificate has been issued. "This is to certify that the above mentioned products meet the requirements specified in CNCA-120-050: 2004 implementation rules for compulsory certification of decorative products and fitment products - porcela....