Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (5) TMI 128

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Shri R.K. Verma, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per: M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides on the stay petition. 2. The applicant is a provider of construction services to various customers. They have availed the benefit of Notification No. 15/2004-S.T., dated 10-9-2004. which permitted them to pay duty on a value which is 33% of the gross amount charged by them on the service ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... period from 10-9-2004 to 31-3-2006 and the Notification No. 4/2005 dated 1-3-2005 amending notification No. 15/2004, explaining that the gross amount charged should include the value of goods and material supplied or provided or used by the provider of construction service would be applicable only from 1-3-2005. He also submits that there was no suppression of any relevant facts to the Department....