TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2007 (7) TMI 710
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ctor Land & Building Tax passed an assessment order on 1-12-1990 assessing the aforesaid flats having market value of Rs. 28]70]700/-. After deducting a sum of Rs. 1 lac from market value at which no tax was payable, the assessing authority held the taxable market value of the aforesaid flats at Rs. 27]70]700/- and determined tax at Rs. 26]060/-. (ii) On 15-4-1991]the Director, Land & Building Tax issued a Circular that the flats in multi-storied buildings should be assessed in accord with the said Circular by treating the flats at one floor as one unit. (iii) In the light of the said Circular dated 15-4-1991, a rectification order came to be issued by the assessing authority under Section 22A of the Rajasthan Lands & Buildings Tax Act, 1964 (for short, "LBT Act") in respect of the aforesaid flats owned by Bharat Petroleum on 27-7-1991. By rectification order, the assessing authority treated the petitioners' flats in 'Kamal Apartment' in four units on the basis of the Circular dated 15-4-1991. On the basis of total market value of all the units as on 1-4-1989, the land & building tax was determined. (iv) Dissatisfied with the order dated 27-7-....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rea covered thereby does not exceed the limit prescribed for purposes of the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 66 or the second proviso to section 67 of the said Act." "(5) 'Land' means land which is, or is capable of being used as a building site, and includes garden or ground appurtenant to a building but does not include a holding as defined in the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (Rajasthan Act 3 of 1955) provided the improvement referred to in sub-clause (a) of clause (19) of section 5 of the said Act over such holding does not exceed such area as has been prescribed for purposes of the second proviso to sub-sec. (1) of Section 66 or the second Proviso to section 67 of the said Act." 6. Section 2(8) & (10) define the expression "occupier" & "owner". It reads thus:- "(8) 'Occupier" means the person in actual occupation or use of the [land or building' or a portion thereof, in respect of which the tax is payable and includes- (a) the owner in occupation. (b) the tenant who for the time being is paying or is liable to pay rent in respect thereof to the owner, (c) the rent free tenant or licence thereof, and (....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ons of a building by different persons from different 'Units' for purpose of land & building tax. The matter was examined in consultation with law Department it has been advised that the definition of 'building' as given in Sec. 3 of Rajasthan Lands & Buildings Tax Act, 1964 includes a portion of building, so also the definition of 'Owner' as given in Sec. 2(10), is with reference to land or building or portion thereof. Again the definition of 'occupier' as given in Sec. 2(8) of the said Act is also with reference to land & building or portion thereof. Further, there is no provision in the said Act for a consolidated assessment of a building separately owned & possessed by different owners and for appointment of the tax so assessed so as to enable recovery from different co-owners. Hence the scheme of the Act, along with the definition referred above, all lead to the irresistible conclusion that a portion of a building owned and possessed separately by different persons is a different unit for the purpose of assessment under said Act. CIRCULAR NO. 27/74 Sd/- S.L. JOSHI Director Lands & Buildings Tax Deptt., R....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the same conditions which are found to exist here were found to exist in the same structures built side by side, and not one above the other, and, if it is possible to have one house built over another house, then all that has been held to constitute a separate house exists here: there is nothing which is held in common; the one structure is superposed upon the other, and that is all." 14. Our own Supreme Court in the case of TATA Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. vs. Gram Panchayat, Pimpri Waghere : AIR 1976 SC 2463 while dealing with the expression 'Houses & Lands' used in Section 89 of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1933 accorded approval to the aforesaid observations made in the cases of Yorkshire Fire & Life Insurance Company and Grant. In paragraph 15 of the report, the Supreme Court observed thus:- "Formerly houses were built so that each house occupied a separate site. In modern times a practice has grown up of putting separate houses one above the other. They are built in separate flats or storeys. For legal and ordinary purposes they are separate houses. Each is separately let and separately occupied. One has no connection with those above or below....