2022 (11) TMI 900
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI Petitioner (By Shri Kamal Khemuka, Advocate) Respondents (By Shri Piyush Jain, Government Advocate) ORDER JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI This is a petition seeking review of order dated 04.05.2022 passed in W.P.No.4349/2022. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner herein had filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority, but th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed attention of this Court that a specific ground 6.2 was taken in the memorandum of petition to the extent that the Appellate Authority did not afford any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and therefore, the order was passed in violation of principle of natural Justice. Counsel contends that this ground has not been dealt with by this Court while dismissing the writ petition i.e. W.P.No.43....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o refer to order dated 04.01.2022 which is contained in Annexure P/2 with the writ petition. A perusal of the same reflects that the petitioner herein had submitted online appeal on 16.09.2019. The second paragraph of the order also reveals that in terms of the information which is available at web-portal, appeal was being dealt with and the Appellate Authority passed order dated 04.01.2022. The p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uthority on 04.01.2022, was given behind the back of the petitioner. It is also nowhere mentioned in the petition as to how the petitioner came to know about the order dated 04.01.2022. Even for the sake of assumption, if the argument of the petitioner is accepted, the absence of necessary pleadings in the petition, does not warrant review of the impugned order passed by this Court. The judgment a....
TaxTMI