2008 (1) TMI 330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mber (T) B.C. Chidanand for the Appellant. K.S. Reddy for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per: S. L. Peeran, Member (J). - Both the stay applications raise common question of law and facts and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law. The appellants are required to pre-deposit in terms of the impugned order. The amounts are Service tax of Rs. 1,86,782 and Rs. 2,36,720 alon....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he entire amounts in terms of section 35F of the Act. As the same was not deposited the appeals were dismissed for non -compliance. Learned counsel submits that on this very issue this Bench has taken a view that the activity carried out by the appellants is not covered under the said category. This view has been expressed in the case of S. R. Kalyanakrishnan Shree Krishna Mandiram v. CCE [2008] 1....