2022 (11) TMI 838

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....U Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Viraj Tiwari & Mr. Ramashish, Advocates. Respondent Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC, for respondent no. 1/Govt. of NCT of Delhi. O R D E R CM APPL. 48825/2022 1. Allowed, subject to the petitioner filing legible copies of the annexures, at least three days before the next date of hearing. W.P.(C) 15684/2022 2. Essentially, the grievance ar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent/revenue has been remiss in not processing petitioner's claim for refund. 4.1. It cannot but be accepted by Mr. Satyakam that, even if the demand raised against the petitioner is adjusted, there will still be huge amount left to be remitted to the petitioner by way of refund. 5. That being said, it is clear that the petitioner has not covered himself with glory. The petitioner has, fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of hearing, to explain as to why, in matter after matter, we find that steps are not taken to refund monies which are otherwise due to petitioners, resulting in a heavy burden on the exchequer. 7.1. The responsible officers will be identified by the Commissioner and suitable corrective measures that the Commissioner wants to take, by way of suggestions, will be placed before us on the next da....