2008 (7) TMI 83
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ocates, for the Appellant. Ms. Rajni Divkar, Sangeeta Mandal, Ms. Shruti Chaudhary, Ms. Swati Sinha, Ms. Jayasree Singh for M/s. Fox Mandal & Co., S/Shri S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate, Jai Singh Brar, Ms. Simran Brar for Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Aarohi Bhalla, Ms. Sujata Kurdukar, Advocates, Vikas Singh, ASG, V. Shekhar, Sr. Advocate, Ashok Bhan, Ms. Aruna Gupta, Vikas Sharma for B. Krishna Prasad, Ad....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed (GSL) is a 'related person' vis-a-vis Procter Gamble Godrej Limited (PGG) which is beyond the scope of show cause notice. We ourselves have gone through the show cause notice and we are satisfied that the finding recorded by the Tribunal insofar as it relates to a 'related person' is beyond the scope of show cause notice and, therefore, the same cannot be sustained and is accordingly set aside.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... to the assessable value. 6. The question of limitation regarding show cause notice issued by the Commissioner (Indore) related to Malanpur factory shall be decided by the Tribunal by recording a separate finding after considering all the relevant facts. 7. All contentions are left open to both the parties. 8. Insofar as the Bombay show cause notice is concerned, the case is remitted to t....
TaxTMI