2008 (8) TMI 29
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Sr. Counsel, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Leave granted. 2. A notice was issued by the Collector of Central Excise, Raipur on 18-2-1992 to show cause as to why excise duty of Rs. 5,10,271/- should not be recovered from the company. On a reply having been filed by the company, the Collector, vide order dated 1-7-1992, confirmed the duty and also imposed penalty of Rs. 2.5 lac upon the com....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Tribunal, by its order dated 21-12-1995, set aside the order-in-original passed by the Collector and remanded the matter to the Collector for re-adjudication. 5. In the meantime, appellants in these appeals filed Misc. Criminal Case No. 3048 of 2005 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the High Court of M.P. at Jabalpur for quashing Criminal Complaint No. 966 of 2000. The Hig....
TaxTMI