2022 (10) TMI 913

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ra a/w Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma for Respondents. Ms Sumity Garg, Dy. Commissioner, CGST & CEX, Mumbai Central Division VIII, present. P.C. : 1 Prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the petition read as under: "(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2019; and (ii) refund of Rs.88,46,01,539/- for the period October 2020 and December 2020, alongwith interest." 2. As regards the refund of Rs.1,02,74,14,843/- claimed in prayer clause (b), Mr. Shroff states that an additional affidavit of one Suyog Nawal affirmed on 17th October 2022 is being filed, in which it is stated that respondent no.3 has sanctioned refund of Rs.1,02,74,14,843/- for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uctions from Ms Garg further states that within one week of receiving the application from petitioner, the interest amount will be paid. If for any reason petitioner is unable to file an online application due to any technical glitches, petitioner is at liberty to file a physical application with said Ms Garg and the application will be promptly processed. Mr. Shroff states that the application wi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....und of Rs.88,46,01,539/- together with interest, if any. Mr. Mishra states that this amount of Rs.88,46,01,539/- together with interest will be paid to petitioner within one week of an application being made by petitioner. In our view, no such application is required because petitioner had already filed the application on which the impugned order was passed and department itself has accepted that ....