AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required

Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

Accused Not Required to Testify in Cheque Dishonor Cases, But Must Present Strong Evidence to Rebut Presumption u/s 139.

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....Dishonor of Cheque - It is clear that the accused need not enter the witness box to rebut the presumption. However, such presumption of law cannot be considered as rebutted only by giving denials and suggestions. There has to be some cogent material brought on record during the evidence of the complainant and his witnesses, on the preponderance of probabilities so as to rebut such presumption - In the present matter and from the cross-examination of the complainant, it is clear that the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of N.I. Act. - HC....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Accused Not Required to Testify in Cheque Dishonor Cases, But Must Present Strong Evidence to Rebut Presumption u/s 139.