2015 (2) TMI 1377
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nding Counsel ORDER R. Subhash Reddy, J. 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the order of assessment dated 29.03.2014, passed by the respondent in Proceedings A.O. No. 31556 under the provisions of the A.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The petitioner is a successful bidder for sand quarry in the sand reach of Eturu village of Chandarlapadu Mandal in Krishna District. He ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... support of his contention, learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance on a judgment of this Court in the case of Sri Uma Maheshwara Rice and Flour Mill, Vetlapalem & Others v. Commercial Tax Officer, Peddapuram & Others (2012) 54 APSTJ 51. 3. Though counter affidavit is not filed, on instructions, it is submitted by the learned government Pleader appearing for respondent that the impug....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d order on the ground that the material basing on which such order is passed, is not supplied to him. 5. On this short ground, without going into merits of the matter, we set aside the impugned assessment order dated 29.03.2014, and remit the matter for fresh consideration by the respondent/Respondent shall furnish to the petitioner, the reports/material supplied by the Regional Vigilance and E....
TaxTMI