2011 (12) TMI 775

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar, J. For the Appellant: S. Krishna Murthy, Advocate For the Respondent: A.V. Krishna Koundinya, Special Standing Counsel ORDER Madan B. Lokur, C.J. 1. Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions is the same and the facts are similar, they are being disposed of by this common order. The grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is that neither the assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....55 and hence the suppressed paddy purchases of Q. 4,257 is proposed to be added to the paddy purchases so reported and the value is arrived at Rs. 25,50,001.00 by adopting the average rate of Rs. 563.19." 3. Similarly, in the revisional order, it is noted that the contention of the petitioner was that the Commercial Tax Officer has passed the assessment order blindly following the report of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s noted above the said authority did not deal with the contention of the petitioners that the report of the Vigilance and Enforcement Department was not supplied to the petitioners and yet it was used against them. 6. Learned Special Counsel for the Commercial Taxes Department says that the petitioners will be supplied with the report of the Vigilance and Enforcement Department within one week ....