Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (10) TMI 160

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 7,69,68,431/- on account of disallowance u/s 14A. As management and decisions about investments always entail certain administrative expenses. The scheme of 14A is very clear that in the case the assessee earned some exempt income and the assessing officer is satisfied that the amount disallowed u/s 14A is not correct, in that scenario the amount disallowed u/s 14A has to be computed by applying Rule 8D. 2. Whether on the fact and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 19,19,163/- on account of disallowance u/s 2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va). As per the provision of section 2(24)(x) of the Act, employee's contribution to provident fund/other welfa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... considering the submissions, partly allowed the appeal. Thereby, the Ld.CIT(A) deleted the addition related to employee's contribution towards PF & ESIC and the addition made by invoking the provision of section 14A of the Act. 5. Aggrieved against the order of Ld.CIT(A), the Revenue is in appeal before this Tribunal. 6. Apropos to Ground No, at the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee supported the order of Ld.CIT(A) and submitted that in this case, Ld.CIT(A) has given a finding on fact that during the year under consideration, the assessee did not earn any exempt income therefore, relying upon the judgement of Hon'ble High Court in the case of Cheminvest Ltd.v s CIT-IV 378 ITR 33 [2015]. 7. On the contrary, Ld. Sr. DR opposed th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T vs M/s. Hindustan EPC Company Ltd. in ITA No.1421/Del/2019 [Assessment Year- 2015-16] vide order dated 29.07.2022 wherein it has been held as under:- 5. "The judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT in ITA No.117/2015 order dated 25.02.2015, thus clinches the issue in favour of assessee. Thus, the CIT(A) has rightly restricted the disallowance to the extent of the exempt income. Significantly, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of PCIT vs. M/s. ERA Infrastructure (India) Ltd. in ITA No.204/2022 and CM APPL.31445/2022 judgment and order dated 20th July, 2022 had the occasion to examine the law on applicability of Section 14A having regard to the newly inserted Explanation to Sec....