Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice — FREE 🎉 ✕

150 credits · 30 days

• Basic Search → 1 Credit
• Advanced Search → 3 Credits
• Drafter → 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(≈ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (7) TMI 223

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ivered by M. M. KUMAR J.— The Revenue has approached this court by filing the instant appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, "the Act"), and has challenged the order dated October 31, 2006, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench-A (for brevity, "the Tribunal"), in I. T. A. No. 649/Chandi/2005. The Tribunal has recorded a categorical finding ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en the view that no question of levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act would arise. 2. It is an admitted position that the assessee had claimed that a sum of Rs. 1,00,000 was received from the NRE Account No. 67, maintained with the State Bank of Patiala, Kurali, by one Harcharan Singh. The aforementioned claim of the assessee was declined and further proceedings for imposition of p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iculars of income have been duly declared, then it cannot be concluded that the assessee has concealed the particulars or has furnished inaccurate particulars of his income. It has also been held that mere observation of the Assessing Officer without recording any satisfaction concerning concealment of income was not sufficient for initiation of proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. On t....