Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (3) TMI 188

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ferential duty affirmed in the impugned order. An amount of Rs.3,13,17,442/- has been demanded as differential duty for the period 1994-95 to 2001-02 (upto July 2001). In passing the orders the lower authorities relied on the test report of the subject product claimed by the appellants to be a washing preparation of CSH 3402.90. On test by the Chemical Examiner and the Chief Chemist, the product was found not to satisfy the prescription in Chapter Note 3 of Chapter 34 for Organic Surface Active Agents (OSAA). 2. HUL has obtained test reports on samples of the product from the Tamilnadu Government Test Laboratory and Vimta Labs, a private lab. Both the test reports certified that the impugned product satisfied the above definition for OSA....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sh off preparation. NCPMFW was classifiable under 3402.90 and the demands were unsustainable. 5. Ld. SDR supports the impugned order. One of the case law submitted by the SDR to back his arguments is a decision of the apex Court which observed that the test reports of the CRCL should not be brushed aside lightly and another decision which underlines the primacy of the guidelines contained in HSN in deciding classification. He takes us through the following Note 5 of Chapter 33 of the Central Excise Tariff in his endeavour to justify classification decided in the impugned order. "Heading No. 33.04 applies, inter alia, to the following products: beauty creams, vanishing creams, cold creams, make up creams, cleansing creams, skinfoods, s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Chapter Heading 34.02 reads as follows : Organic surface active agents (other than soaps), surface active preparations, washing preparations (including auxiliary washing preparations) and cleaning preparations whether or not containing soap 340210 - Sulphonated castor oil, fish oil or sperm oil 340290 - Other HSN notes on CH 3402 reads as follows: "Chapter Heading  34.02 covers organic surface active agents (other than soaps), surface active preparations, washing preparations (including auxiliary washing preparations) and cleaning preparations whether or not containing soap, other than those of heading no. 34.01".  HSN notes divide these goods in two parts. Part-I covers "organic surface active agents" and part-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1. Builders (ex. Sodium poly phosphates, carbonates, silicate or borate, salts of Nitrilotri acetic acid) 2. Boosters (ex. Alkanol amids, fatty acid amids, fatty and oxides) 3. Fillers (ex. Sodium sulphate or chloride) for  ancillaries (ex. Chemical or optical bleaches, corrosion inhibiters, colouring matter, perfumes, enzymes). 6.3   Vide letter dated  10.07.01,  Director CRCL,  confirmed that the product composed essentially of surface active agents, poly hydric alcohol, cellulosic substance, perfume and other additives.  7. We find that the impugned product is applied on the face for its care as per the show cause notice. From the test results relied on by the revenue, it is seen that the ....