Home / 
2018 (1) TMI 1692
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the appellant Shri Amresh Jain, AR for the respondent ORDER Per B. Ravichandran: When the appeal was called, ld. AR submitted that the Revenue's appeal is against the order dropping the demand against the respondent. With reference to work executed for DMRC, he submitted that both facts and legal interpretation are involved in deciding the appeal by the Revenue. He admitted that RUDs ....
TaxTMI