Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (2) TMI 251

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. [Order] - Revenue filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), whereby adjudication order was modified insofar as penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was upheld for the period up to August, 2004 and the amount of penalty was reduced from Rs. 7,85,095/- to Rs. 2,61,185/-. 2. Ld. DR submits that the respondent failed to file the Returns during the materi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat the adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of tax and imposed penalty under Section 78 of the Act for suppression of fact. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that Section 76 of the Act for imposition of penalty for non-filing of return was proposed in the show cause notice. But no penalty was imposed under Section 76 in the adjudication order. So, the submission of the ld. DR to impose p....