2022 (9) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvs. Respondents Through: Mr Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Ms Shruti Shivkumar, Ms Vidhi Jain, Mr Farman Ali and Ms Taha Yasin, Advs. for R-1 & 3. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): 1. The only impediment, it seems, in refunding the amount which has accrued to the petitioner pursuant to the Order-in-Appeal dated 22.05.2020, revolves around the issue, as to which is the authority that is required to rem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ircular dated 16.09.2014 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Excise & Customs. 4.1. Based on the said circular, Mr Prakash says that the application had to be moved before respondent no.1 and had the application for refund been made to the said respondent, it would have been processed by him. 5. Mr. Kumar, contends to the contrary a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the challan 04.06.2010 evidencing the said payment is appended as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. 7.3. The amount indicated therein i.e., Rs. 7,30,913/-, which was deposited towards differential duty, includes the amount appropriated i.e., Rs 4,16,755/- by virtue of order-in-original dated 28.05.2019. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the following directions: ....