Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 244

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Bharat Raichandani, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri R. B. Tiwari, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent., [Order per Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice President]. - Vide impugned Order the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai has confirmed demand of Rs. 4,13,87,026/- together with interest and imposed equal amount of penalty upon the appellants herein by inclusion of advertisement and publicity charges i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1-7-2000. For the period subsequent thereto. Tribunal's Order once again in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra Final Order No. A/2050-2051/WZB/2005/C-III/EB, dated 1-12-2005 holds similar view. The same view was taken by the Tribunal in the case of CCE v. Swaraj Mazda Ltd., final order No. 629-633/05-NB-A dated 18-5-2005. In a recent order in the case of Kinetic Engineering, final order No. A/286 288....