2007 (10) TMI 244
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Bharat Raichandani, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri R. B. Tiwari, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent., [Order per Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice President]. - Vide impugned Order the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai has confirmed demand of Rs. 4,13,87,026/- together with interest and imposed equal amount of penalty upon the appellants herein by inclusion of advertisement and publicity charges i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1-7-2000. For the period subsequent thereto. Tribunal's Order once again in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra Final Order No. A/2050-2051/WZB/2005/C-III/EB, dated 1-12-2005 holds similar view. The same view was taken by the Tribunal in the case of CCE v. Swaraj Mazda Ltd., final order No. 629-633/05-NB-A dated 18-5-2005. In a recent order in the case of Kinetic Engineering, final order No. A/286 288....
TaxTMI