2008 (4) TMI 102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, S/Shri Haresh Mehta, Suvrajyoti Gupta and Harsh Parekh, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order] - These Civil Appeals are filed by the Department and are directed against the order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, dated 6th November, 2006, in Appeals Nos. E/2480/2006 and E/2481/2006. 2. Respondent-assessee claimed exemption in respec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... concerned with the period 10th February, 1998 to March, 1998. 3. As stated above, if RMC is produced at site, then alone the assessee is entitled to exemption under the requisite Notification. We may state that the word 'site' has not been defined in the Notification though it so defined in the later Circular. We may also state that with the advancement of technology, there could exist batchin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted in its order that there was no dispute between the parties that RMC was manufactured at site. We do not know on what basis the said finding is recorded by the Tribunal, particularly when the Commissioner in the above order has held that RMC has been manufactured at Pen and Padghe and thereafter moved to the construction site. Therefore, it cannot be said that there was no dispute that RMC was ....