2008 (1) TMI 281
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., SDR, for the Respondent. [Order] - The brief facts of the case are that the appellant had cleared the goods to their sister unit at a value which was determined by them by adding their profit margin. On being told that they are liable to pay duty @ 115% of the cost price as provided under Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rule, they deposited differential duty amounting to Rs. 19 lakhs for t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esting the demand of refund amounting to Rs. 8,00,000/-. He is limiting his appeal to its liability to pay interest which has been imposed on it by the Commissioner (Appeals). It is his submission that interest was demanded from them by a separate show cause notice which was adjudicated by the Jt. Commissioner who had dropped the demand of interest. Commissioner (Appeals) has still chosen to confi....
TaxTMI