Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

Revenue's appeal dismissed; Commissioner (Appeals) rightly reduced redemption fine on undervalued imported goods to 10%.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Valuation of imported goods - Used tyres - rejection of declared value - It is settled position in law that it is the discretion of the authority deciding to determine the quantum and fine and penalty as per the gravity of the offence involved. - There are no merits in the appeal filed by Revenue challenging the order of Commissioner (Appeals) whereby he has reduced the redemption fine equivalent to 10% of undervaluation and which is in accordance with the order of Bangalore CESTAT - AT....

PrevPreviousNextNext