2014 (7) TMI 1367
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 1, 2 and 2 of 2014 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH For the Petitioner Mr. P. Rajkumar For the Respondent Mr. S. Kanmani Annamalai Government Advocate (Taxes) JUDGMENT Mr. Kanmani Annamalai, learned Government Advocate (Taxes), takes notice for the respondent. With the consent of the learn....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o the petitioner and pass a speaking order afresh, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law. 3 The facts leading to the filing of the writ petitions have been narrated in the impugned common order passed in the writ petitions and therefore, it is not necessary to re-state the facts once again. 4 The learned counsel for the appellant/writ petitioner would contend that the learned ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nce with law and therefore, it cannot be said that they have been put to prejudice and hence, prays for dismissal of these writ appeals. 6 It has to be pointed out, at this stage, that, once it has been found that the orders impugned in the writ petitions are unsustainable on account of violation of principles of natural justice, it is wholly unnecessary to impose any condition while remitting ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI