Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (6) TMI 187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enue appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 52/2005 dated 30-5-2005. The relevant para which is under challenge is Para 10 which is reproduced herein below. 10.0 The primary contention in every notice (covered in the impugned order) is that the assessment has been finalized by adopting the on-board ullage survey quantity according to the Trade Notice No. 83/92 issued by the Commissioner of Central ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of shore tank out-turn quantity. The Revenue has also attempted to distinguish the Apex Court judgment relied by the Commissioner (A) in the order. 2. We have heard both sides. 3. We notice that the main issue pertaining to acceptance of shore tank out-turn quantity for the purpose of assessment stands finalized and settled in terms of Apex Court judgment noted by the Commissioner (A) in Par....