Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 1224

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....earned counsel for the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 27.03.2018 passed by the respondent no. 4 along with appellate order dated 29.04.2019 passed in appeal no. 78/18 of 2017-18- 183 by respondent no. 3." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner st....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g to Rs. 1,14,124/- and seizure order was passed seizing the goods. Against the seizure order, Appeal No. 78/18 of 2017-18 was preferred for the year 2017-18 under U.P. CGST Act read with rule 129 (3) of the Rules. The appeal of the petitioner was rejected justifying the seizure order, against which the present writ petition has been filed. 5. Per contra, learned standing counsel supports the o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....riod from 01.02.2018 to 31.03.2018, requirement of U.P. e-way bill was not applicable to the transactions of the petitioner and therefore, the seizure, demand of security and penalty cannot be justified. 8. The Division Bench of this Court in LG Electronics India Private Limited Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in 2019 NTN (70) 109, in paragraph no. 56, has held that the goods were not requi....