Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 1073

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....osed of. BAIL APPLN. 1950/2022 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 776/2022-INT. BAIL 1. This is an application for grant of regular bail to the applicant in CC No. 77/2019, SFIO v. Bhushan Steel Ltd. & Ors., under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013. 2. It is stated by Mr. Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the applicant (A-187), that the applicant is a Chartered Accountant by profession. 2. The applicant was partner with Mr. R.K. Mehra of Mehra Goel & Co., who was a Statutory Auditor for mostly category B and C Companies which was directly under the control of the promoters. He submits that the applicant has not appended his signature on any of the financial statement including bank loan utilization certificate of the Accused Company and it w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e accused persons to face prosecution in respect of following offences: 187. A- 187: Vinay Jain: u/s 447 of the Companies Act, 2013. " 4. Mr. Vaidyanathan submits that the Applicant herein, was a Partner of Mehra Goel & Co. along with one Late Mr. R.K. Mehrotra, the said firm had conducted the audit of BSL (Accused No. 1 Company) and other Category - B Companies which was involved in the fraud of siphoning of money availed through Credit facilities from banks and then investing the same in the preference shares of BSL for managing its debt equity ratio. As per the Statements of the applicant, he was heading the team of Charted Accountants responsible for auditing Bhushan Steel and the other co-accused companies. Huge amount of f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the board of BSL. [Dr. Rajesh Kumar Yaduvanshi v. SFIO, CRL. REV.P. No. 1308 of 2019 vide order dated 21.09.2020]. d. Co-accused, Mr. Pankaj Mahajan who is also a practicing Chartered Accountant at the firm, M/s. A.C. Gupta & Associates is also admitted on bail by a coordinate bench of this court in BAIL APPLN No. 1813 of 2022 titled Pankaj Mahajan v. SFIO dated 29.06.2022. e. A coordinate bench of this court also enlarged Rupesh Purwar, co-accused no. 203 on bail. He was signatory to the Financial Statements of the company for the FY 2013-14 and 2014-15 in his capacity as the Company Secretary, which he had signed for the purpose of regulatory filing of the Company. [Rupesh Purwar v. SFIO, CRL. M.C. No. 2878 of 2022 date....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... this backdrop, in the absence of a fair likelihood of the trial being completed within a reasonable period, this Court must be mindful of the need to protect the personal liberty of the accused in the face of a delay in the conclusion of the trial. We are inclined to grant bail on the above ground having regard to the fact that the appellant has been in custody since 28 August 2019. In Nittin Johari (supra), this Court has held: "24. At this juncture, it must be noted that even as per Section 212(7) of the Companies Act, the limitation under Section 212(6) with respect to grant of bail is in addition to those already provided in CrPC. Thus, it is necessary to advert to the principles governing the grant of bail under Section 439 o....