Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 874

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....JOHN MATHAI, SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN, SRI.KURYAN THOMAS AND SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM RESPONDENT: ADV SMT.PREETHA S. NAIR, SC, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS JUDGMENT Basant Balaji J., The appellant challenges the final order in appeal No. E/185/2008-DD of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore wherein the challenge against the order of the commissi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Commissioner of Central Excise passed Annex-D order dropping all proceedings initiated against the assessee. Annex-D order was a subject matter of review by the Commissioner of Central Excise and the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise also filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) by order dated 29.11.2007, set aside Annex-D order of the Join....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....entral Excise duty. By connivance of two parties, sovereign function of payment of duty cannot be avoided. In the instance case, the principal and the job worker with a conspiracy as stated above have made an attempt to evade the payment of duty. They tried to take advantage of the technicality of the law." Hence, the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) demanding Rs.10,52,892/- was confirm....