Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (6) TMI 1676

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner: Mr. Arvind H Gupta, PCS For the Respondent: None ORDER Per Shri Ravikumar Duraisamy, Member 1. This petition is filed by "Insuflex Ind Private Limited", Represented through its Director and Shareholder Mr. Prakash Chandru Chablani seeking relief against the respondent, inter-alia among other things, to restore the name of the company in the Register of Companies maintained by the Re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efore the aforesaid action was taken by the Opp. Party. It has two Directors namely Mr. Prakash Chablani and Mr. Mohamad Ansari. The shares of the Petitioner are held by two shareholders namely Mr. Prakash Chablani 9500 Equity Shares (95%) and Mr. Mohamad Ansari 500 Equity Shares (5%). The Balance Sheet of the Company was ready since 2012 and the company has filed Income-tax Return also till date,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....complying with statutory requirements and to remove the name of directors from the list of disqualified directors exhibited on MCA. 6. The Respondent side filed a detailed written Submissions dated 25.04.2019 explaining the sequence leading to the striking off of the name of the company. The Respondent side issued STK-1 notice dated 11.03.2017 and STK-7 dated 11.07.2017. The company has not made ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... these Nil figures indicates that the company currently exists only on paper, not carrying on any business or operation which substantiates the criteria as laid down in section 248 of the Companies Act 2013, therefore, the action taken by ROC is justified and the Bench did not feel any ground to interfere with action of striking off the name of the company by ROC. The Bench is also of the consider....