Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2019 (6) TMI 1676

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner: Mr. Arvind H Gupta, PCS For the Respondent: None ORDER Per Shri Ravikumar Duraisamy, Member 1. This petition is filed by "Insuflex Ind Private Limited", Represented through its Director and Shareholder Mr. Prakash Chandru Chablani seeking relief against the respondent, inter-alia among other things, to restore the name of the company in the Register of Companies maintained by the Re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efore the aforesaid action was taken by the Opp. Party. It has two Directors namely Mr. Prakash Chablani and Mr. Mohamad Ansari. The shares of the Petitioner are held by two shareholders namely Mr. Prakash Chablani 9500 Equity Shares (95%) and Mr. Mohamad Ansari 500 Equity Shares (5%). The Balance Sheet of the Company was ready since 2012 and the company has filed Income-tax Return also till date,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....complying with statutory requirements and to remove the name of directors from the list of disqualified directors exhibited on MCA. 6. The Respondent side filed a detailed written Submissions dated 25.04.2019 explaining the sequence leading to the striking off of the name of the company. The Respondent side issued STK-1 notice dated 11.03.2017 and STK-7 dated 11.07.2017. The company has not made ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... these Nil figures indicates that the company currently exists only on paper, not carrying on any business or operation which substantiates the criteria as laid down in section 248 of the Companies Act 2013, therefore, the action taken by ROC is justified and the Bench did not feel any ground to interfere with action of striking off the name of the company by ROC. The Bench is also of the consider....