2016 (6) TMI 1448

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....notice and service of SPC. 2. Respondent No. 3/State is a formal party. 3. Respondent No. 1 Bano Bi filed a complaint case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioner and the respondent No. 2 Rehan Khan; alleging that certain land was sold by respondent No. 1 in favour of the petitioner in which consideration of Rs. 4 Lakhs was given to respondent No. 1 by cheque d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sed. Hence, the order dated 8-2-2010 does not suffer from any illegality or irregularity. 5. The petitioner preferred this petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashment of the order passed in Criminal Case No. 1418/2010 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal. 6. On behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel Mr. Ashok Lalwani has vehemently argued t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8. In the present case, it is admitted fact that the drawer of the cheque was the respondent No. 2, who had drawn the cheque bearing number "224385" for Rs. 4 Lakhs in the bank account maintained by him in HDFC Bank, Bharat Talkies, Hamidia Road Branch, Bhopal, towards the consideration of the sale. Therefore, the respondent No. 2 was the drawer of the cheque. 9. The Supreme Court in the case of ....