2013 (12) TMI 1729
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Respondent No. 1 ORAL ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the order dated 07/06/2013 passed below application Exh.66 in Criminal Case No.521 of 2011 by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (NIA), Court No.28, Ahmedabad, rejecting the application of the petitioner to bring the affidavits of third parties on....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cing of the evidence by complaining party; cross-examination of various witnesses by the accused for rebutting the allegations made against him and then option of the accused either to lead evidence in defence or to explain the incriminating circumstances under Section 313 of Cr.PC. It also cannot be disputed that statement under Section 313 is required to be appreciated by the Courts keeping in v....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Section 311 of Cr.PC. That was a case where statement under Section 313 was yet to be recorded and before that, defence had adduced certain evidence and it is at that point of time that the application for additional evidence came to be made by the appellant before the Hon'ble Apex Court explaining the circumstances therefor. The facts of that case and the present case do not warrant any compariso....
TaxTMI