Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (12) TMI 1729

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the order dated 07/06/2013 passed below application Exh.66 in Criminal Case No.521 of 2011 by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (NIA), Court No.28, Ahmedabad, rejecting the application of the petitioner to bring the affidavits of third parties on record of the case in rebuttal to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....; cross-examination of various witnesses by the accused for rebutting the allegations made against him and then option of the accused either to lead evidence in defence or to explain the incriminating circumstances under Section 313 of Cr.PC. It also cannot be disputed that statement under Section 313 is required to be appreciated by the Courts keeping in view the evidence on record. Concededly, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tatement under Section 313 was yet to be recorded and before that, defence had adduced certain evidence and it is at that point of time that the application for additional evidence came to be made by the appellant before the Hon'ble Apex Court explaining the circumstances therefor. The facts of that case and the present case do not warrant any comparison. The Courts below rightly found that the c....