Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (5) TMI 978

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s in Criminal OP No. 1633 of 1992 quashing the process issued in Criminal Complaint No. 356 of 1990 filed by the present appellant, the appellant has preferred this appeal. 2. The appellant-complainant filed a private complaint against the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 alleging that the complainant supplied goods to the accused o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent, prosecution against the drawer of cheque was not maintainable. 3. It has been rightly pointed out that the said question is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Anil Hada v. Indian Acrylic Ltd. 2000 1 SCC 1 Explaining Section 141 of the Act, this Court observed that 3 categories of persons can be brought within the purview of the penal liability through the legal fiction ....