2022 (6) TMI 710

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Choudhary, Member (Judicial) Sh. Vijay Kumar, Advocate for the appellant Ms. Tamanna Alam, Authorised Representative for the respondent ORDER This application for rectification of mistake has been filed by the Revenue for rectification of mistake in Final Order No. 50278/2022 dated 07.03.2022 in Service Tax Appeal No. 50424 of 2021 (SM). 2. The issue involved before the Commissioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enue on the ground that service tax on digging of well and borewell is not covered under the definition of "Agriculture Operations" like cultivation, harvesting, etc., Learned Commissioner (Appeals) was pleased to observe that there was lack of sufficient proof as the affidavit of the farmers were not supported by payment receipt from those farmers and certificate issued by the respective Gram Pan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....me of the farmer/ service receiver, who have received the services of borewell/ well digging and the amount paid by each individual farmer. Further, the appellant has also filed copies of certificate issued by the financing bank, which has given the name of the borrower mentioning the Kisan Credit Account number and the amount sanctioned etc., the amount spent for the borewell. Thus, the status of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e had produced some new documentary evidences before the Tribunal in support of their appeal, whereas the first Appellate Authority has categorically mentioned that apart from four affidavits from four farmers, value of service being Rs.3,18,000/-, nothing was produced before the Court below. This Tribunal had taken notice that Commissioner (Appeals) in the case of other similarly situated assesse....