2022 (4) TMI 1007
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng Counsel ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 13.08.2012 and Corrigendum dated 22.08.2012, bearing C.No.VIII/10/27/2003-CHAL and to quash the same. 2.The impugned order is challenged primarily on the ground that simultaneous proceedings were initiated both under Regulation 20(2) and Regulation 22 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. 3.Though the pe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....essment, etc. But, during the personal hearing before the Inquiry Officer, the Managing Director of the CHA company submitted that he was not interested in cross-examining the said officers.'' 4.The Managing Director of the petitioner has also accepted the mistake in his letter dated 07.07.2011, and requested the respondents to revoke the suspension order and to give life to CHA Licence. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... strength of fake documents generated by the petitioner. Therefore, there is no merit in the Writ Petition particularly, in the light of the fact that there is an admission of guilt by the Managing Director of the petitioner on 07.07.2011. Under these circumstances, I am inclined to dismiss this Writ Petition. At the same time, however, I am inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to file a st....