Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1979 (8) TMI 7

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sed by the Commissioner of Income-tax dismissing revisions, which in turn were directed against the appellate orders rejecting the plea that the petitioner-assessee was not liable to penalty under s. 271(1)(a) for delay in filing the return. For the assessment year 1967-68, admittedly, the return was filed four months late while for the assessment year 1968-69, it was filed 22 months late. The ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t and no evidence has been led to establish that fact. When the delay is admitted and the default has taken place under cl. (a) of s. 271 (1), the penalty is imposable if the assessee had delayed in filing the return without reasonable cause. He has prima facie to satisfy the authorities that he had reasonable cause for the delay in filing the return. Under cl. (a) the penalty is not imposed for a....