Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1982 (6) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NI J.-By this reference under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, has referred the following question of law to this court for its opinion : " Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the Explanation to sec. 271(1)(c) as it then existed, the Tribunal was justified in reducing the quantum of penalty to an amount less than t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the Tribunal, the Department sought a reference and it is at the instance of the Department that the aforesaid question has been referred to this court for its opinion. Shri Mukati, the learned counsel for the Department contended that the Tribunal could not reduce penalty which was less than the income assessed in the assessment proceedings. The learned counsel for the Department relied on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....concerned with the relevant cl. (iii) of s. 271(1) of the Act, which was substituted by the Finance Act, 1968. The Tribunal, therefore, was required to determine the amount of income in respect of which the particulars had been concealed or inaccurate particulars had been furnished. The Tribunal had to give a finding in that behalf in the penalty proceedings. In this connection, we may usefully re....