Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (3) TMI 944

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y<br>Abni Ranjan Kumar Sinha, Member (J) and L.N. Gupta, Member (T) For Appearing Parties: Shailendra Singh, Rochit, Neha Mathen, Ritesh Khare, Rajdev Singh, Sumit Shukla and Deepika, Advocates ORDER 1. Cont. Petition 07/2022: By filing this Contempt Petition, the Applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: "a) Initiate the contempt proceedings against the Respondent/Suspended Directors n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Rs. 26,08,436/- and therefore, contempt proceedings may be initiated against the Respondents. In terms of submissions, when we peruse the order dated 21.10.2021, we observe that by the same order, direction was given to the RP/Applicant that if the amount is not paid within two weeks from the date of the order, the RP/Applicant will take steps in accordance with the provision of law including ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o the page no. 59 of the additional affidavit filed by him and submitted that the RP vide order dated 21.08.2021 has admitted part claim of Rs. 22,27,198/- only and rejected the remaining claim of the Applicant on the ground that the same was time barred. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant submits that since the RP has rejected the part claim and also refused to admit the interest being time barred, so....