2022 (3) TMI 922
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ish Chandra Sharma] W.A. No.198 of 2016 arises out of an order in W.P. No. 36838 of 2014 and W.A. No. 199 of 2016 arises out of an order in W.P. No. 31143 of 2015. Both the said writ petitions were decided by the learned Single Judge vide common order dated 29.02.2016. The writ appeals are of the year 2016. Today, learned counsel for the appellants prays for time to argue the matters. Earlie....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and destructive of the Petitioners' fundamental rights and set aside the summons No. ECIR/09/HYZO/2011/2800 dated 19/11/2014 issued by the Respondent No.1 and pass such order or other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." The aforesaid relief makes it very clear that the summons was issued on 19.11.2014 by the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s are required to be passed in W.A.No.198 of 2016 and all the issues are left open. In W.A. No. 199 of 2016, again when the summons was issued by the Enforcement Directorate, the writ petition was preferred i.e., W.P. No. 31143 of 2015 challenging the action of the respondent No.1 in the writ petition in initiating further steps and the same was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by a common....
TaxTMI