2022 (1) TMI 1216

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iates for the Petitioner. Mr. H.S. Venegavkar for the Respondent No.1/ED. Ms. Veera Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2-State. ORDER P.C. : 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 Mr. Venegavkar raises a preliminary objection. He submits that the aforesaid petition would not be maintainable, inasmuch as, the original bail application filed by the petitioner below Exhibit-12 has been wi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he preliminary objection raised by the Enforcement Directorate on the purshis with respect to maintainability. 4 Considering the fact, that the bail application has already been withdrawn, the question of considering the impugned order passed on the purshis dated 18th June 2021, filed by the petitioner, does not arise. 5 Needless to state that if the petitioner files a fresh bail application bef....