Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Director's Penalty Overturned: Rule 26 Lacks Proof of Intent in Alleged Clandestine Activities, Order Insufficiently Reasoned.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the director of the appellants in clandestine activities or not - here are not much reasoning has been assigned by the said order, to show that Director was having mens rea or direct involvement for invocation of Rule 26 - Since the impugned order fails to establish the ingredient of โ€œmens reaโ€ on the part of the Appellant 2 who was otherwise performing their duties as employee of the company, the penalties imposed on the Director, cannot be upheld. - AT....