2021 (10) TMI 1299
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN,J. Heard Sri Pranjal Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.B. Pandey, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India and the learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shiv P. Shukla, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the opposite parties. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief:- "Wherefor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....020 (E.D.) for allegedly committing an offence under Section 3 punishable under Section 4 of Prevention of Money Laudering Act, 2002 (here- in-after referred to as the "Act, 2002") without taking into account the fact that that petitioner is being falsely prosecuted in this case. Therefore, he is humbly praying for the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Sri Pranj....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... E.D. should have been shown to be an independent conclusion but E.D. has narrated the same conclusion as of C.B.I. without application of mind. Sri Pranjal Krishna has also submitted that the supplementary complaint has been filed in sheer, illegal and unwarranted manner inasmuch as such supplementary complaint could have not been filed invoking the explanation No.2 of Section 44 (1) of Act, 2....
TaxTMI