2022 (1) TMI 1057

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re given to the driver. It is further averred that the petitioner's area was facing intermittent network outage. The transporter being in a hurry to complete the task assigned and as the goods had already been loaded to the vehicle commenced movement of goods without waiting for e-way bill to be generated and given by the petitioner. 2.1 On 07.09.2021 the truck loaded with the goods was intercepted by the respondent No.2. The driver produced the tax invoice as well as the transport receipt, there was no discrepancy found in the quantity as per invoice and the quantity loaded with the conveyance. However, the goods had been detained since e-way bill was not available with the driver. 2.2 On 10.09.2021 the detention order and confiscation notice were served to the petitioner. Apart from non-availability of e-way bill, the authority has alleged that the registration of the recipient was being shown as suspended and that the goods had been undervalued. 2.3 On 17.09.2021 on receipt of notice, the petitioner addressed a letter to the authority and request was made preliminary objections raised to invoke the powers of confiscation under Section 130 of the Goods and Services Tax A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es vs. State of Gujarat passed in Special Civil Application No.1368 of 2021. 2.10 On 12.11.2021 such representation was accepted and revised letter was issued whereby the goods were ordered to be provisionally released on payment of tax, penalty and furnishing of bond. 2.11 In due compliance on 16.11.2021 the petitioner made payment of tax, penalty as well as furnished the bond. However, the respondent No.2 did not release the goods or conveyance. Instead on 20.11.2021 the respondent issued another letter intimating the petitioner that the goods and conveyance will be released provisionally on furnishing security along with the bond. 2.12 On 20.11.2021 the petitioner requested for the provisional release since the tax and penalty had already been paid and bond was furnished, however, that was not done and hence, his goods and vehicle continued to be detained. According to the petitioner, this is wholly arbitrary and illegal action. The representation had also been made contending that while it was ready to make payment of tax and penalty, for the remaining amount the statutory provision only required furnishing of bond. The demand for security is totally mechanical and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....elf, the request was made for provisional release of the goods and conveyance being number KA-17-C-1451. Reference is also made of provision of law to urge that the insistence on the part of the respondent for furnishing of securities is not necessary. 6. Section 67(6) of the Gujarat Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 ('the GST Act' hereinafter) speaks of the provisional release: "67(6): The goods so seized under sub-section (2) shall be released, on a provisional basis, upon execution of a bond and furnishing of a security, in such manner and of such quantum, respectively, as may be prescribed or on payment of applicable tax, interest and penalty payable, as the case may be." 7. It is clear that the goods seized can be released under Sub-section (2) of Section 67 of the GST Act on a provisional basis upon execution of the bond and furnishing of the security and on payment of applicable tax, interest and penalty as the case may be. Section 129(2) of the GST Act provides for adopting of provision of Section 67(6) of the GST Act which says that the provision of Sub-section (6) of Section 67 shall mutatis mutandis apply for detention and seizure of goods and conveyance. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ated 08.02.2021, this Court observed in para 5 as under:- "5. Let the proceedings with respect to the confiscation proceed further in accordance with law. We are not inclined to interfere at this stage. However, we are inclined to order provisional release of the goods pending the confiscation proceedings on the condition that the writ applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs. 18 Lakh with the respondent No.2 towards the tax and penalty. For the balance amount towards fine of Rs. 52 Lakh, the writ applicant shall execute a bond to the satisfaction of the respondent No.2 with an undertaking that ultimately, if the goods are held liable to be confiscated, he shall make good the entire payment towards fine in lieu of confiscation. This writ application is disposed of directing the respondent No.2 to release the goods on payment of Rs. 18 Lakh and other conditions as imposed by this Court." 3. We have heard Mr. Uchit N. Sheth, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP appearing for the opponents. 4. It is very sad to note that, the respondent No.2 being an officer of the GST Department has no idea as to what is a "....