Court Upholds CIT(A) Decision: Assessee's Evidence Admitted to Clarify Ownership of "Essar" Brand, No New Facts Introduced.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Admission of additional ground of appeal - as the additional evidence filed by the assessee was not with a purpose or motive of bringing any fresh facts on the record, but with a limited purpose of dispelling all doubts and substantiating to the hilt that EIL was the owner of “Essar” brand prior to its settlement in the assessee trust, therefore, on the said count also no infirmity can be related to the admission of the same by the CIT(A). We, thus, in terms of our aforesaid observations not finding any infirmity in the admission of the additional evidence by the CIT(A), uphold his order to the said extent. - AT....