Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (4) TMI 1286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....referred to as the "appellant") against the Order-in-Original No. ZX0812200116424, dated 10-12-2020 (hereinafter referred to as the "impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax Division-I, Jaipur, (hereinafter called as the "adjudicating authority"). 2. Brief facts of the case : 2.1 The appellant having GSTIN No. 08AAHCP3657N1ZS is a Export Oriented Unit (EOU) and are engaged in export of software services against LUT, has filed refund application of Input Tax Credit on the items of goods and services of inward supply utilized for Export of Services without payment of Tax vide ARN No. AA081120018379G, dated 10-11-2020 for the period April, 2020 to June, 2020 amounting to Rs. 12,63,847/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pproached the CGST Commissioner and he was kind enough to get us the copy of the SCN and Rejection Order downloaded and sent to us through email dated 28-1-2021. Copy of email enclosed. And copy of the SCN No. ZU08112200269756, dated 23-11-2020 and Rejection Order No. ZX0812200116424, dated 10-12-2020 is enclosed. Reply to Show Cause Notice and Personal Hearing : Since the appellant did not get the copy of SCN either on portal or through post the appellant could not file its reply to the aforesaid SCN. The appellant could not attend the Personal Hearing scheduled on 8-12-2020 because it did not have any information due to non-receipt of SCN. Consequently the refund Rejection Order was passed by the Adjudicating Authority ex parte. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... implies that full amount of the refund claim is approved, Secondly it is an order which have been passed without support of any law because there is no mention of any Act or its Section or sub-sections. This Itself is enough to quash and set aside this order as it is a nullity and does not have any legal effect as it has been drafted without any application of legal mind. Rather it has been passed in an arbitrary and capricious manner. Regarding remark in the rejection order regarding non-mention of Export Invoice reference in the FIRC, appellant would like to submit most respectfully that the appellant has been getting the FIRC from the bank for so many years and its refund claims were being sanctioned from the GST Deptt. but the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....attached. Furthermore, there is a statement in the SCN that "HSN/SAC is mandatory as per Circular No. 135/05/2020-GST, dated 31-3-2020." (a)        Firstly this is just a statement of fact about what is required as per the above mentioned circular. But it does not point out any deficiency in our refund application. (b)        Secondly even there is no whisper about this statement in the Rejection Order. So it can be safely interpreted that while passing the rejection order also the Adjudicating Authority did not find any deficiency regarding HSN/SAC in the appellant's Refund claim. 5. Personal hearing in virtual mode through video confer....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p;In this context, the appellant submitted that wording of order state that zero amount of refund has been rejected which in turn implies that full amount of refund claim approved. Secondly, order has been passed without support of any law because there is no mention of any Act or its Section or sub-sections. 9. Further, the appellant submitted that they have been getting the FIRC from bank for so many years and its refund claims were being sanctioned from the GST department but the invoice no. or other reference no. is never mentioned in the FIRC. Only the exporter name and amount in foreign currency is mentioned in FIRC which matches with the FC amount in export invoice. He further stated that even then the appellant approached it....