Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (1) TMI 234

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R Per Beena Pillai, Judicial Member Present appeal is filed by assessee against order dated 20/11/2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-9, Bangalore on following grounds of appeal: "1. The order of CIT-A is opposed to Law and facts of the case. 2. The CIT-A erred in holding that consideration received in excess of consideration recorded in Sale Deed as "Income from Other Sources". ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 54F of the Act. 7. The CIT-A erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s. 234A, 234B & 234C of the Act and further calculation of interest u/s. 234A, B & C of the Act is not in accordance with Law since the rate, method of calculation is not discenarable from the order of the assessment on the fact and circumstance of the case. 8. The appellant craves, lead to add, alter, amen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....there were deposits in the bank account of the assessee which was submitted to be sale consideration received. The Ld. AO observed that there is difference in the sale consideration claimed and what was recorded in the sale deed. He held the difference in sale consideration to be unexplained income from other sources, and made addition of Rs. 61,48,693/-. The Ld. AO also computed the long term cap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee. We note that the Ld. CIT(A) rejected additional evidences. It is noted that the Ld. CIT(A) held the sale proceeds received by assessee over and above the sum mentioned in the registered sale deed as Income from other sources. In our view, the Ld. CIT(A) should have admitted the additional evidences and considered the claim in the light of additional evidences filed by assessee. 5. On the is....