2016 (5) TMI 1570
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Kanchan CIT(DR) ORDER PER S.V. MEHROTRA, A.M: These are assessee's appeals assailing separate orders of ld. CIT(A) relating to AY 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09. Identical grounds are involved for adjudication in all these appeals, therefore, the same were heard together and are being disposed of by a composite order for the sake of convenience. ITA no. 1235/Del/2016 (AY 2006-07): 2. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....erein no notice u/s 144 of the Act or any show cause notice was served to the assessee before making such a huge addition. Ld. CIT(A) had called for a remand report, which has been reproduced at page 3 of his order in which primarily the AO justified his action u/s 144 and, therefore, relying on the same, ld. CIT(A) rejected the assessee's claim. 4. Ld. counsel referred to page 15 of the PB and....
TaxTMI