2021 (12) TMI 1101
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....was ... For the Petitioners Mr. A. Roy, Ld. GP Mr. S. Mukherjee, Mr. N. Chatterjee ... For the State ORDER Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioners have challenged the impugned order of adjudication dated 1st November, 2021 passed by the GST Authority concerned as appears at page 47 to the writ petition. Main ground of challenge of the impugned....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... It is a settled law that opportunity of hearing may be afforded either by way of allowing the petitioners to make any written representation for their case or it may be by allowing personal hearing and in this case petitioners were allowed to make written representation/objection and when petitioners have not asked for personal hearing and petitioners have not been able to show any provision of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....der, is having inherent lack of jurisdiction under the statute or he is not authorised to exercise the jurisdiction of adjudication in the case of the petitioners. If the petitioners are not satisfied with the impugned adjudication order or reasons according to petitioners in not sufficient or proper, it can be a case of appeal but not a case for invoking Constitutional writ jurisdiction under Art....
TaxTMI